Please take some time to review the nominations for the 2008 UU Blog Awards and let me know if anything looks strange, out of place etc. What sort of feedback am I looking for? Well, lets start with a great comment that came in.
Noticed that two cross-posted posts are listed separately. (CC's and Ministrare's.) Could they be listed together, since the content is the same? I think they have a good chance of winning, and it'd be a shame to split the votes between them.Makes sense to me considering it looks like it was co-authored. I'll plan on combining those.
It would have helped me to read a reminder to click on the "nominate" button at the bottom of the page-----before I got there!The page has been updated, thanks for the suggestion. I also noticed PeaceBang commenting that process seemed complicated. Any comments on making things easier would be appreciated.
I find it depressing that you have to check for irregular voting patterns. I know that's the way it works, but it's too bad.Well, if it's any consolation I have never found anything noteworthy in those reviews. The comment is their primarily to discourage any activity along the lines of ballot stuffing.
Sad to see the Best Commenter go, but I understand why you took it down.Well, there wasn't much feedback in support of the category. If others felt it was a good category I would certainly bring it back next year. I am sure if there are any particular commenter that you wanted to nominate they may appreciate you giving them a nod on your blog. One of the big benefits of the process is highlighting all the great contributions throughout the year - win or lose.
Thanks for doing this every year!I think it's a worthwhile effort, glad it's appreciated.
So, are any blogs nominated in the wrong category? (Seminarian, minister, etc.) Any New blogs that are really old blogs?
Also, anyone nominated that would prefer to withdraw various nominations so that votes are not split please post here.