Friday, February 02, 2007

Third Annual UU Blog Awards Feedback

Just a basic post to get feedback on the blog award process. What can be done better next year? It's an evolving process.

Should we have nominations, and then a run off to determine the five (at most) for voting? Or do folks like the long lists of potential vote getters?

Would it be easier for people to submit specific posts to an e-mail address? It might help by giving me a way to respond to any questions, and having a reply address.

More time to nominate, more time to vote, too long?

Would a time line announced further ahead of time help, or does that not really matter?

4 comments:

ms. kitty said...

Even though I didn't end up in the top two or three, I was still thrilled to learn that I got a few percentage points of the vote. I hope you post the whole list of vote-getters in the next competition. Thanks for all your hard work on this.

UUpdater said...

Ms. Kitty - the full list can be viewed by clicking on the "Votes" tab at the top of the page.

ms. kitty said...

This is an unrelated comment. I keep trying to access Dame Olympia's blog and getting a completely unrelated page about "olympia". I don't have an email address for her but would like to let her know that there's something wrong. Do you know how to do that?

UUpdater said...

I believe she is aware of the errors in displaying the blog, I was notified that she had taken it down.